<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Emad Ibrahim - Latest Comments in Unit Test Linq to Sql in ASP.Net MVC with Moq</title><link>http://emadibrahim.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://emadibrahim.disqus.com/unit_test_linq_to_sql_in_aspnet_mvc_with_moq/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 07:41:04 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Unit Test Linq to Sql in ASP.Net MVC with Moq</title><link>http://www.emadibrahim.com/2008/04/04/unit-test-linq-to-sql-in-aspnet-mvc-with-moq/#comment-10976695</link><description>&lt;p&gt;hello &lt;br&gt;ezyak ya emad&lt;br&gt;ana delwa2ty 3andy application 3amlo &lt;a href="http://asp.net" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="asp.net"&gt;asp.net&lt;/a&gt; mvc + subsonic to create DAL&lt;br&gt;ana 3wz a3ml unit test 3la l controllers w ana ma3rafsh 2y 7aga fl testing wla 3omry 3amlto abl kda&lt;br&gt;fa yaret te2oly a3mlha ezy bebasata l2n ana lsa babtedy fa bera7a 3la a5ok:D&lt;br&gt;thnx in advance&lt;br&gt;salam&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hatem</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 07:41:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unit Test Linq to Sql in ASP.Net MVC with Moq</title><link>http://www.emadibrahim.com/2008/04/04/unit-test-linq-to-sql-in-aspnet-mvc-with-moq/#comment-9276768</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, &lt;br&gt;In my opinion, DB Unit Testing is DB developer's business, not Application developer's. At least it is true in my organization, we believe the common developers are not good at database design, especially in the modern OO era.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We employed a powerful DB unit testing tool, it named as AnyDbTest. (&lt;a href="http://www.anydbtest.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.anydbtest.com"&gt;www.anydbtest.com&lt;/a&gt;). By using this tool, we need NOT write Java/.Net DB unit testing code any more.  We can configure one xml file to tell what we want to test and what is our assertion.  Then AnyDbTest can do the rest things.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Additionally, we can versioned control the xml-style test case just like the code files. It is very handy. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dbunittest</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 08:46:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unit Test Linq to Sql in ASP.Net MVC with Moq</title><link>http://www.emadibrahim.com/2008/04/04/unit-test-linq-to-sql-in-aspnet-mvc-with-moq/#comment-4533091</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you - very helpful!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 19:34:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unit Test Linq to Sql in ASP.Net MVC with Moq</title><link>http://www.emadibrahim.com/2008/04/04/unit-test-linq-to-sql-in-aspnet-mvc-with-moq/#comment-1601706</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@cannonfodder good catch, I meant to reference the private field authenticatedController.  I fixed the code.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Emad Ibrahim</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:54:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Unit Test Linq to Sql in ASP.Net MVC with Moq</title><link>http://www.emadibrahim.com/2008/04/04/unit-test-linq-to-sql-in-aspnet-mvc-with-moq/#comment-1601705</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think there's an error in the AuthenticatedController property. It seems to reference controller which does not appear to be declared. Did you mean to use authenticatedController?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">CannonFodder</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:32:58 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>