<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Emad Ibrahim - Latest Comments in Google Chrome JavaScript Speed Test</title><link>http://emadibrahim.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://emadibrahim.disqus.com/google_chrome_javascript_speed_test/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 09:05:19 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Google Chrome JavaScript Speed Test</title><link>http://www.emadibrahim.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-javascript-speed-test/#comment-2935143</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Did you try setting the default browser back to IE or Firefox?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Emad</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 09:05:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Chrome JavaScript Speed Test</title><link>http://www.emadibrahim.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-javascript-speed-test/#comment-2933934</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i installed google chrome and found that any links in windows live mail only opened google chrome home page. it would not go to the link. so i removed google chrome. now any link, including live mail ‘help’ or ‘get technical support’ comes up with an error ‘Application not found’&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Craps Tournaments</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 06:36:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Chrome JavaScript Speed Test</title><link>http://www.emadibrahim.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-javascript-speed-test/#comment-2740737</link><description>&lt;p&gt;On Win 2008 Server (x86) under Chrome it looks incorrect - as you described above.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vladimir Kelman</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:46:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Chrome JavaScript Speed Test</title><link>http://www.emadibrahim.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-javascript-speed-test/#comment-2638017</link><description>&lt;p&gt;try opera, for some reason with prototype it owns the competition =P but that's the only one that's faster, otherwise, google chrome ftw!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 03:30:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Chrome JavaScript Speed Test</title><link>http://www.emadibrahim.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-javascript-speed-test/#comment-2307318</link><description>&lt;p&gt;that's the time it took it to complete the test, so the longer the bar the&lt;br&gt;slower the browser&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Emad</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 17:23:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Chrome JavaScript Speed Test</title><link>http://www.emadibrahim.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-javascript-speed-test/#comment-2307084</link><description>&lt;p&gt;ikmust be missing something, it looks as if ie is the winner here, must be really rendering wrong for me :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">robert</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 17:03:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Chrome JavaScript Speed Test</title><link>http://www.emadibrahim.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-javascript-speed-test/#comment-2126965</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's interesting...  I am using Vista 64...  I am not sure if that would&lt;br&gt;make a difference...  I just checked again and it is still broken and by the&lt;br&gt;way, this is a fresh vista install as of 3 hours ago.&lt;br&gt;-Emad&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Emad</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 18:48:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Chrome JavaScript Speed Test</title><link>http://www.emadibrahim.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-javascript-speed-test/#comment-2126693</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm using chrome to view this page and the insert from google docs looks correct as you describe, and not like the incorrect version picture you've posted....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hutchwilco</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 18:40:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Chrome JavaScript Speed Test</title><link>http://www.emadibrahim.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-javascript-speed-test/#comment-2041523</link><description>&lt;p&gt;should be interesting to see if Chrome works more efficiently than FireFox and IE... if it's faster than Firefox, since isn't IE, then i'll use it&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">movie buff</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 16:09:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Chrome JavaScript Speed Test</title><link>http://www.emadibrahim.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-javascript-speed-test/#comment-2029340</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Regardless of how the test is created, it is still the same test on all&lt;br&gt;browsers...  This is not really a benchmark of how fast chrome is.  It is a&lt;br&gt;relative comparison between the browsers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Emad</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 09:36:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Chrome JavaScript Speed Test</title><link>http://www.emadibrahim.com/2008/09/02/google-chrome-javascript-speed-test/#comment-2027812</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This test introduces delay in the javascipt so the browser doesn't lock up.  Remove the delay then benchmark chrome.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ByteEnable</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 04:57:07 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>