<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Emad Ibrahim - Latest Comments in ASP.NET MVC &amp;amp; Threads</title><link>http://emadibrahim.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://emadibrahim.disqus.com/aspnet_mvc_amp_threads/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 10:30:28 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: ASP.NET MVC &amp;amp; Threads</title><link>http://www.emadibrahim.com/2008/07/01/aspnet-mvc-threads/#comment-1601794</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Emad, BackgroundWorker is designed just for Windows apps AFAIK. Also with your updated code you run the risk of running out of threads if you just create them on the fly like that. I would suggest you use ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem()&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">duncansmart</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 10:30:28 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>